AM Material Comparison with Selectable Ashby Chart

AM Material Comparison with Selectable Chart

AM Material Comparison Matrix

Select two properties and click “Draw Chart.” Values are legacy illustrative screening inputs, not qualified allowables or current supplier quotes. Points with values under review are omitted for the affected axis.

1. Comparison Matrix

Material Density (g/cm³) Illustrative cost ($/kg) Assumed powder loss (%) Tensile Strength (MPa) Yield Strength (MPa) Young’s Modulus (GPa) Elongation (%)
316L Stainless Steel 8.00 60 10 620 290 193 45
17-4 PH Stainless Steel 7.80 80 10 Under review Under review 200 10
15-5 PH Stainless Steel 7.75 90 10 Under review Under review 200 12
Ti-6Al-4V 4.43 350 12 880 880 114 14
Ti-6Al-4V ELI 4.42 400 12 900 825 110 10
Inconel 718 8.19 300 15 1240 1030 205 12
Inconel 625 8.44 320 15 660 415 210 30
Inconel 939 8.20 340 15 1100 850 207 15
AlSi10Mg 2.68 80 8 380 250 70 7
AlSi12 2.65 90 8 275 200 70 8
Scalmalloy® Under review 500 12 580 520 72 11
Maraging Steel (MS1) 8.05 200 10 2000 1800 197 9
Cobalt Chrome (CoCr) 8.30 250 12 1100 670 240 8
Copper Alloy (CuCrZr) 8.80 150 15 370 320 130 5
Tool Steel (H13) 7.80 120 10 1400 1200 210 7

2. Select Properties for Ashby Chart

3. Ashby Chart

How to use this material comparison

Start with function and environment, then filter candidate alloys before comparing density and mechanical properties. Every usable property set should identify the machine, process parameters, orientation, heat treatment, surface condition and test method.

Design needCandidate family to investigateNext check
Low structural massTitanium or aluminum alloysStiffness, fatigue, temperature and route maturity.
High-temperature serviceNickel alloysCreep, oxidation and heat-treatment condition.
Corrosion resistanceStainless steels or nickel alloysSpecific medium, temperature and corrosion mechanism.
Heat transferCopper or aluminum alloysConductivity after the actual process and thermal route.

Data status and corrections — 12 September 2026

The legacy table mixes material conditions and lacks traceable, row-level validation. Its prices and powder-loss factors are illustrative assumptions. They must not be treated as current quotations or measured production losses. Two stainless-steel strength pairs had yield strength above tensile strength; those entries are now withheld. The legacy Scalmalloy density is also withheld pending a traceable replacement. Missing values are excluded from the affected chart axes.

For replacement inputs, obtain route-specific manufacturer data and dated quotes. Carpenter Additive provides a starting point for powder specifications. The earlier bibliography has been removed because its claimed numeric provenance could not be established in this review.

From alloy selection to company research

CompanyConnectionResearch question
Carpenter TechnologySpecialty metal powder capabilitiesWhich grades have recurring, qualified demand and meaningful financial contribution?
Nikon / Nikon SLMMetal LPBF platformsWhich machine–material combinations are validated, and does demand convert to repeat production?

Technical capability sources: Carpenter Additive and Nikon SLM.

Company exposure is a research starting point, not a stock recommendation. A relevant technology does not establish material revenue, attractive margins or a reasonable valuation. Check current filings, ownership, cash flow and customer concentration before drawing an investment conclusion.

Continue with powder reuse control and accepted-part economics.

Take the next step: the free AM Bottleneck Atlas

Assess material selection through the full production route. The Industrial AM Bottleneck Atlas 2026 connects manufacturing constraints with qualification, economics and company exposure.

Get the free Atlas and subscribe to the AM Bottleneck Brief →

Confirm your email after subscribing. See the Atlas page for delivery details.