Tag: industrial manufacturing

  • 3D Printing vs Additive Manufacturing: Understanding the Similarities and Differences

    3D Printing vs Additive Manufacturing: Understanding the Similarities and Differences

    Additive manufacturing and 3D printing are two popular technologies that have been around for a while. These technologies have revolutionized the way things are made, allowing for the creation of complex and intricate designs that were previously impossible. While the terms “3D printing” and “additive manufacturing” are often used interchangeably, there are some key differences between them.

    In this blog post, we will discuss the similarities and differences between 3D printing and additive manufacturing, and highlight some of the advantages and limitations of each technology.

    3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is a process of creating three-dimensional objects by building up layers of material. The process starts with a digital design that is sliced into multiple layers, which are then printed one layer at a time. There are several types of 3D printing technology, including Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Stereolithography (SLA), and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS).

    FDM is one of the most common 3D printing technologies, and it involves the extrusion of melted plastic through a nozzle to create layers that are stacked on top of each other. SLA, on the other hand, uses a laser to cure a liquid resin that hardens into a solid. SLS uses a laser to fuse powdered material together to create the final object.

    One of the main advantages of 3D printing is its ability to create complex and intricate designs that were previously impossible to make using traditional manufacturing methods. Additionally, 3D printing can be faster and less expensive than traditional manufacturing methods, especially for small production runs.

    Another advantage of 3D printing is its ability to produce customized parts. Since 3D printing involves building up layers of material, it is possible to create parts with unique geometries and features that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods.

    While 3D printing has many advantages, it also has some limitations. One of the main limitations of 3D printing is its limited range of materials. Most 3D printers are limited to printing with plastics, although some can print with metals and other materials.

    Additionally, 3D printing can be slow and expensive for large production runs. Since the process involves building up layers of material, it can take a long time to print a large object. Furthermore, the cost of 3D printing can be high for larger production runs, making it less cost-effective than traditional manufacturing methods.

    Additive manufacturing, like 3D printing, is a process of creating three-dimensional objects by adding material layer by layer. However, additive manufacturing involves the creation of objects by adding material, which may or may not come in layers. This technology is often used for industrial applications, and it can involve a wide range of materials, including metals, plastics, and ceramics.

    an image of a very complex metal part with lattice structures, part is being made by industrial additive manufacturing machine.

    There are several types of additive manufacturing processes, including binder jetting, directed energy deposition, and material extrusion. Binder jetting involves depositing a liquid binder onto a bed of powder material to create the final object. Directed energy deposition involves using a laser or electron beam to melt material as it is being deposited. Material extrusion, similar to FDM, involves the extrusion of material through a nozzle to create layers that are stacked on top of each other.

    One of the main advantages of additive manufacturing is its ability to create complex geometries and designs that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods. Additionally, additive manufacturing can be faster and less expensive than traditional manufacturing methods, especially for small production runs.

    Another advantage of additive manufacturing is its ability to create customized parts. Since additive manufacturing can create parts with unique geometries and features, it is possible to create parts that are tailored to specific applications.

    Additive manufacturing is also a more sustainable manufacturing method than traditional manufacturing methods. Since additive manufacturing only uses the material that is needed to create the final product, there is less waste generated during the manufacturing process.

    Like 3D printing, additive manufacturing also has some limitations. One of the main limitations of additive manufacturing is its limited range of materials. While additive manufacturing can use a wider range of materials than 3D printing, it still has some limitations in terms of the types of materials that can be used.

    Additionally, additive manufacturing can be slow and expensive for large production runs. While additive manufacturing can be faster and less expensive than traditional manufacturing methods for small production runs, it can be slower and more expensive for larger production runs.

    Another limitation of additive manufacturing is its size limitations. Since additive manufacturing involves building up layers of material, it can be difficult to create large objects using this method. However, there are some companies that are working on developing larger scale additive manufacturing technologies that can create larger objects.

    an image of a 3d printer building vibrant colored toys, high quality, reaslistic photo.

    While there are some key differences between 3D printing and additive manufacturing, there are also some similarities between the two technologies.Both 3D printing and additive manufacturing involve the creation of three-dimensional objects by adding material layer by layer. Additionally, both technologies allow for the creation of complex geometries and designs that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods.Another similarity between 3D printing and additive manufacturing is their ability to create customized parts. Both technologies allow for the creation of parts with unique geometries and features that can be tailored to specific applications.

    Despite the similarities between 3D printing and additive manufacturing, there are also some key differences between the two technologies.One of the main differences between 3D printing and additive manufacturing is the range of materials that can be used. 3D printing is mostly used for plastic low cost FDM, SLA type of applications, while additive manufacturing is often used for industrial applications and can involve a wider range of materials, including metals, plastics, and ceramics.

    Another difference between 3D printing and additive manufacturing is their size limitations. 3D printing is often used for creating smaller objects, while additive manufacturing can be used to create larger objects, albeit with some limitations.

    Additionally, 3D printing is often faster and less expensive than additive manufacturing for small production runs. However, for larger production runs, additive manufacturing can be faster and more cost-effective than 3D printing.

    3D printing and additive manufacturing are two popular technologies that have revolutionized the way things are made. While the terms “3D printing” and “additive manufacturing” are often used interchangeably, there are some key differences between the two technologies.

    3D printing involves the creation of objects by building up layers of material, while additive manufacturing involves the creation of objects by adding material, which may or may not come in layers. Additionally, 3D printing is mostly used for plastic low cost FDM, SLA type of applications, while additive manufacturing is often used for industrial applications and can involve a wider range of materials.

    Despite these differences, both 3D printing and additive manufacturing allow for the creation of complex and intricate designs that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods. Additionally, both technologies allow for the creation of customized parts that can be tailored to specific applications.

    As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that we will see further advancements in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, and these technologies will continue to change the way things are made.

  • Desktop Metal and TriTech Titanium Parts Bring Titanium Alloy Ti64 to Binder Jet 3D Printing on the Production System™

    Desktop Metal and TriTech Titanium Parts Bring Titanium Alloy Ti64 to Binder Jet 3D Printing on the Production System™

    TriTech Titanium Parts LLC, a Detroit-based manufacturer of titanium parts for aerospace, marine, and automotive industries, and Desktop Metal, Inc., a global leader in additive manufacturing technologies for mass production, have announced the customer-qualification of Ti64 for binder jet 3D printing on the Production System™. The high-speed Single Pass Jetting (SPJ) technology platform features two models: the P-1, for research and development of binder jetting projects for serial production, and the P-50, the world’s fastest metal binder jet system, offering the lowest cost per part with SPJ technology. Ti64 is a popular material, known for its excellent strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. Binder jetting of Ti64 simplifies the production of complex titanium parts, which can be challenging and expensive to fabricate using traditional manufacturing methods.

    Desktop Metal Production System via Desktop Metal

    TriTech Titanium Parts LLC, which is ISO 9001:2015 certified, uses metal injection molding (MIM), investment casting, and now binder jet 3D printing on the Desktop Metal Production System P-1 to produce titanium parts. The company is a spin-off of AmeriTi Manufacturing Co., which was founded in 1984 and sold last year to Kymera International.

    TriTech’s owner, Robert Swenson, who is also the former owner of AmeriTi, stated that with binder jet 3D printing, titanium production of even the most complex geometries can be greatly simplified and achieved at a lower cost. Swenson, a graduate of Purdue University with a degree in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA from Harvard Business School, is incredibly proud to be the first Desktop Metal Production System P-1 customer worldwide to binder jet 3D print titanium, and the company is excited to offer this new manufacturing technology to its customers.

    With the latest addition to the material portfolio, Desktop Metal offers the ability to binder jet 23 metals, including copper, aluminum, and now, titanium. Ric Fulop, Founder and CEO of Desktop Metal, stated that they are excited to help engineers and manufacturers produce complex, once-impossible designs in a wide range of metals, including challenging materials such as titanium.

    While Ti64 is a popular material, it’s also known for being expensive to manufacture. The material’s strength, as well as its low thermal conductivity and ductility, make it challenging to machine or produce with traditional manufacturing methods. Shaping the material with MIM requires special knowledge and processes. TriTech is among a very small percentage of companies that produce titanium parts with MIM, and the company has developed its own MIM processes after years of R&D. However, with binder jetting, the process can be simplified and made more economical.

    Binder jetting is a process where an industrial printhead selectively deposits a binder into a bed of Ti64 powder particles, creating a solid part one thin layer at a time, just like printing on sheets of paper. The form or shape produced by the printer is then sintered to high density and accuracy in a furnace, similar to the MIM process. Additionally, binder jetting allows unbound material to be reused in the process, adding to its cost efficiency.

    Desktop Metal’s binder jet technology can 3D print almost any powder, which is why the company has a tiered material qualification system for metals to signify the varying levels of material property results produced by. Production System users interested in working with titanium should consult their Desktop Metal sales representative on hardware and binder requirements.

    TriTech will discuss its experience binder jetting Ti64 at AMUG 2023, held March 19-23 in Chicago. The topic will be part of a Desktop Metal panel discussion from 1:30-2:30 p.m. Thursday, March 23,

  • Uniformity Labs Releases UniFuse™ IN718 Nickel Alloy for High-Performance L-PBF Printing

    In the world of additive manufacturing, Uniformity Labs has just released its latest innovation: UniFuse™ IN718 Nickel Alloy, optimized for L-PBF printing at 60um layer thickness. The highly advanced ultra-low porosity metal powder feedstock allows for repeatable part builds at the highest throughput, producing parts with improved and repeatable mechanical properties, even while printing at significantly higher build rates, utilizing thicker build layers, and the more efficient use of L-PBF lasers.

    But don’t take Uniformity’s word for it. Independent engineering consultancy EWI has released a detailed material property validation study on the performance of UniFuse™ IN718, conducted by Ajay Krishnan, research leader at EWI – Buffalo Manufacturing Works. The study confirms that UniFuse™ IN718 is the best-in-class material for mechanical properties, surface finish, printing yield, and part reliability, with substantially increased throughput printing at 60um layer thickness.

    via uniformitylabs

    According to Uniformity’s founder and CEO Adam Hopkins, UniFuse™ IN718 is a significant step forward for additive manufacturing, delivering on the promise of no compromise additive manufacturing. The optimized parameters for L-PBF printing at 60um layer thickness with lasers power at 400W achieved a 2.2X faster exposure time and superior, more uniform mechanical properties compared to competitors’ lower layer thickness scan strategies targeting best-in-class mechanical properties.

    With the new UniFuse™ IN718 release, Uniformity Labs has addressed the industry challenge of achieving serial production in AM economically, allowing additive manufacturing to become an increasingly better-established serial production tool. Its highly advanced ultra-low porosity metal powder feedstock, currently in production under the product brands UniFuse™ (for L-PBF) and UniJet™ (for binder jetting), has dramatically improved the ability to produce high-quality parts repeatedly and at scale.

    In conclusion, the release of UniFuse™ IN718 nickel alloy by Uniformity Labs, along with its optimized scanning parameters, is a significant development in additive manufacturing. The ability to print with 60um layer thickness and achieve 2.2 times faster exposure time with superior mechanical properties compared to competitors’ lower layer thickness strategies is a game-changer. The independent validation study conducted by EWI adds further credibility to the product and its capabilities. With the development of its ultra-low porosity metal powder feedstock, Uniformity Labs is addressing the challenge of achieving serial production in AM economically. The impact of this development on the industry is significant, as it will enable additive manufacturing to become an increasingly established serial production tool. The availability of steel, aluminum, and titanium powders under the brand UniFuse™ and UniJet™, with many others nearing availability, shows that the technology is advancing rapidly. This news is a clear indication that additive manufacturing is continuously evolving, and new innovations will undoubtedly push its limits even further in the future.

    via uniformitylabs