Author: Addithive

3D Printing vs Additive Manufacturing: Understanding the Similarities and Differences
Additive manufacturing and 3D printing are two popular technologies that have been around for a while. These technologies have revolutionized the way things are made, allowing for the creation of complex and intricate designs that were previously impossible. While the terms “3D printing” and “additive manufacturing” are often used interchangeably, there are some key differences between them.

In this blog post, we will discuss the similarities and differences between 3D printing and additive manufacturing, and highlight some of the advantages and limitations of each technology.

3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is a process of creating three-dimensional objects by building up layers of material. The process starts with a digital design that is sliced into multiple layers, which are then printed one layer at a time. There are several types of 3D printing technology, including Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), Stereolithography (SLA), and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS).

FDM is one of the most common 3D printing technologies, and it involves the extrusion of melted plastic through a nozzle to create layers that are stacked on top of each other. SLA, on the other hand, uses a laser to cure a liquid resin that hardens into a solid. SLS uses a laser to fuse powdered material together to create the final object.

One of the main advantages of 3D printing is its ability to create complex and intricate designs that were previously impossible to make using traditional manufacturing methods. Additionally, 3D printing can be faster and less expensive than traditional manufacturing methods, especially for small production runs.

Another advantage of 3D printing is its ability to produce customized parts. Since 3D printing involves building up layers of material, it is possible to create parts with unique geometries and features that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods.

While 3D printing has many advantages, it also has some limitations. One of the main limitations of 3D printing is its limited range of materials. Most 3D printers are limited to printing with plastics, although some can print with metals and other materials.

Additionally, 3D printing can be slow and expensive for large production runs. Since the process involves building up layers of material, it can take a long time to print a large object. Furthermore, the cost of 3D printing can be high for larger production runs, making it less cost-effective than traditional manufacturing methods.

Additive manufacturing, like 3D printing, is a process of creating three-dimensional objects by adding material layer by layer. However, additive manufacturing involves the creation of objects by adding material, which may or may not come in layers. This technology is often used for industrial applications, and it can involve a wide range of materials, including metals, plastics, and ceramics.

There are several types of additive manufacturing processes, including binder jetting, directed energy deposition, and material extrusion. Binder jetting involves depositing a liquid binder onto a bed of powder material to create the final object. Directed energy deposition involves using a laser or electron beam to melt material as it is being deposited. Material extrusion, similar to FDM, involves the extrusion of material through a nozzle to create layers that are stacked on top of each other.

One of the main advantages of additive manufacturing is its ability to create complex geometries and designs that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods. Additionally, additive manufacturing can be faster and less expensive than traditional manufacturing methods, especially for small production runs.

Another advantage of additive manufacturing is its ability to create customized parts. Since additive manufacturing can create parts with unique geometries and features, it is possible to create parts that are tailored to specific applications.

Additive manufacturing is also a more sustainable manufacturing method than traditional manufacturing methods. Since additive manufacturing only uses the material that is needed to create the final product, there is less waste generated during the manufacturing process.

Like 3D printing, additive manufacturing also has some limitations. One of the main limitations of additive manufacturing is its limited range of materials. While additive manufacturing can use a wider range of materials than 3D printing, it still has some limitations in terms of the types of materials that can be used.

Additionally, additive manufacturing can be slow and expensive for large production runs. While additive manufacturing can be faster and less expensive than traditional manufacturing methods for small production runs, it can be slower and more expensive for larger production runs.

Another limitation of additive manufacturing is its size limitations. Since additive manufacturing involves building up layers of material, it can be difficult to create large objects using this method. However, there are some companies that are working on developing larger scale additive manufacturing technologies that can create larger objects.

While there are some key differences between 3D printing and additive manufacturing, there are also some similarities between the two technologies.Both 3D printing and additive manufacturing involve the creation of three-dimensional objects by adding material layer by layer. Additionally, both technologies allow for the creation of complex geometries and designs that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods.Another similarity between 3D printing and additive manufacturing is their ability to create customized parts. Both technologies allow for the creation of parts with unique geometries and features that can be tailored to specific applications.

Despite the similarities between 3D printing and additive manufacturing, there are also some key differences between the two technologies.One of the main differences between 3D printing and additive manufacturing is the range of materials that can be used. 3D printing is mostly used for plastic low cost FDM, SLA type of applications, while additive manufacturing is often used for industrial applications and can involve a wider range of materials, including metals, plastics, and ceramics.

Another difference between 3D printing and additive manufacturing is their size limitations. 3D printing is often used for creating smaller objects, while additive manufacturing can be used to create larger objects, albeit with some limitations.

Additionally, 3D printing is often faster and less expensive than additive manufacturing for small production runs. However, for larger production runs, additive manufacturing can be faster and more cost-effective than 3D printing.

3D printing and additive manufacturing are two popular technologies that have revolutionized the way things are made. While the terms “3D printing” and “additive manufacturing” are often used interchangeably, there are some key differences between the two technologies.

3D printing involves the creation of objects by building up layers of material, while additive manufacturing involves the creation of objects by adding material, which may or may not come in layers. Additionally, 3D printing is mostly used for plastic low cost FDM, SLA type of applications, while additive manufacturing is often used for industrial applications and can involve a wider range of materials.

Despite these differences, both 3D printing and additive manufacturing allow for the creation of complex and intricate designs that would be difficult or impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods. Additionally, both technologies allow for the creation of customized parts that can be tailored to specific applications.

As technology continues to evolve, it is likely that we will see further advancements in 3D printing and additive manufacturing, and these technologies will continue to change the way things are made.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 28, 2023

Ensuring Quality in Additive Manufacturing: The Importance of Nondestructive Testing (NDT)

Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, more commonly known as 3D printing, has seen a massive evolution in the past few years. From being used for prototypes and concepts, the technology has progressed to part-for-part substitution and the creation of unique, AM-specific part geometries. Today, these applications are increasingly present in demanding, mission-critical fields such as medicine and aerospace, where materials with specific thermal, stiffness, corrosion, and static loading properties are required. To advance in these arenas, metallic, ceramic, and polymer composite AM parts need to be free from discontinuities, and the manufacturing processes have to be stable, robust, and repeatable. And the nondestructive testing (NDT) technology and inspection methods will need to be sufficiently capable and reliable to ensure that discontinuities will be detected to prevent the components from being accepted for use.

The AM technology has seen a tremendous evolution in the past few years, and its impact on manufacturing is substantial. It has opened up new possibilities in terms of design and has the potential to change how we think about manufacturing. With the ability to create unique geometries, manufacturers can now design and produce complex parts that would have been impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods.

But the technology’s advancement hasn’t come without its challenges, particularly when it comes to material quality. In critical industries like aerospace and medicine, where lives depend on the quality of the parts produced, there’s no room for error. The parts need to be free from discontinuities, and the manufacturing process has to be stable, robust, and repeatable to ensure quality. To ensure that AM parts are up to standard, NDT technology and inspection methods have to be reliable and capable enough to detect any discontinuities that might compromise the parts’ quality.

In this blog post, we’ll discuss the impact of AM technology on critical industries like medicine and aerospace, the challenges manufacturers face in producing high-quality parts, and the role of NDT technology and inspection methods in ensuring that AM parts meet the required standards.

AM Parts in Demanding Fields

AM parts have come a long way from being used for prototyping and concepts. Today, these parts are increasingly used as part-for-part substitution in demanding fields like medicine and aerospace. In the medical industry, AM technology is used to produce patient-specific implants, surgical tools, and dental crowns, among others. These parts are designed to fit each patient’s unique anatomy, improving the success rates of surgeries and reducing the risk of complications.

In the aerospace industry, AM technology is used to produce parts that can withstand the harsh environments of space, such as rocket nozzles and satellite components. These parts need to be strong, lightweight, and able to withstand extreme temperatures and pressures. AM technology allows manufacturers to produce parts with unique geometries that cannot be produced using traditional manufacturing methods, making it ideal for aerospace applications.

The Importance of Material Quality

In demanding fields like medicine and aerospace, where the quality of the parts produced can mean the difference between life and death, material quality is crucial. AM parts need to be free from discontinuities like porosity, cracking, and delamination, which can compromise the part’s structural integrity. Any discontinuities in the parts can result in catastrophic failure, which is unacceptable in critical applications.

To ensure that AM parts are free from discontinuities, the manufacturing process has to be stable, robust, and repeatable. Manufacturers need to ensure that the parts are produced under optimal conditions to reduce the likelihood of discontinuities. The process needs to be controlled to ensure that each part produced meets the required standards.

Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Technology and Inspection Methods

NDT technology and inspection methods are essential in ensuring that AM parts meet the required standards. NDT is a method of evaluating the properties of a material, component, or system without causing damage or altering the material’s physical properties. NDT techniques can be used to detect any discontinuities in AM parts, ensuring that they are free from defects.

There are several NDT techniques used in the industry, including radiographic testing, ultrasonic testing, magnetic particle testing, liquid penetrant testing, and eddy current testing. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of technique depends on the type of material and the type of defect being detected.

Radiographic testing, also known as X-ray testing, is commonly used to detect internal defects in metallic parts. The technique involves passing X-rays through the part being tested and capturing the resulting image on a film or digital detector. The resulting image can then be evaluated for any discontinuities, such as porosity or cracking. Radiographic testing, for example, is an effective technique for detecting internal defects in metallic parts. This makes it a useful tool for inspecting complex internal geometries that can be produced using additive manufacturing.

Ultrasonic testing is another commonly used NDT technique. The technique involves sending high-frequency sound waves through the material being tested and measuring the time it takes for the waves to bounce back. The resulting data can be used to evaluate the material’s properties, such as thickness, and detect any discontinuities, such as cracks. However, it is important to note that while ultrasonic testing may have limitations in inspecting complex geometries and rough surfaces of additive parts, it is still a widely used and effective NDT technique for detecting defects in a range of materials. Ultrasonic testing may not be the most suitable technique for inspecting all additive manufactured parts and that other NDT techniques may need to be used in conjunction with ultrasonic testing to ensure that all defects are detected.

Ultrasonic Inspection via I, Plenumchamber

Magnetic particle testing is used to detect surface and subsurface cracks in ferromagnetic materials. The technique involves applying a magnetic field to the part being tested and applying magnetic particles to the surface. The particles will be attracted to any areas where the magnetic field is distorted, indicating the presence of a crack. Like ultrasonic inspections surface roughness can be a problem in terms of inspectability and interpretation.it is important to consider the surface preparation of additive manufactured parts before performing NDT inspections to ensure accurate and reliable results.

Liquid penetrant testing is used to detect surface defects, such as cracks and porosity, in non-porous materials. The technique involves applying a liquid penetrant to the surface of the part being tested and allowing it to seep into any defects. The penetrant is then removed, and a developer is applied to the surface, highlighting any defects.Liquid penetrant testing is a widely used technique for detecting surface defects in non-porous materials. However, it is less suitable for use on porous materials such as metal foam or additively manufacture surfaces, where the penetrant can seep into the material and give false results. The technique is also limited to detecting defects that are open to the surface, making it less effective for detecting subsurface defects.

Karl Deutsch Prüf- und Messgerätebau GmbH + Co KG

Eddy current testing is used to detect surface and subsurface defects in conductive materials. The technique involves passing an alternating current through a coil, creating a magnetic field. The magnetic field will induce an electrical current in the part being tested, creating a secondary magnetic field. Any changes in the secondary magnetic field can be used to detect any discontinuities in the part.Eddy current testing is a non-destructive technique that can be used to detect surface and subsurface defects in conductive materials. It is particularly useful for detecting defects in thin-walled structures, such as those commonly produced using additive manufacturing. However, the technique is less effective on non-conductive materials such as ceramics and polymers.

Stefan Trache – Visualization of Eddy Current Induction by Induction Coil

Overall, the choice of NDT technique for additive manufactured parts will depend on a variety of factors, including the type of material being inspected, the type of defect being detected, and the cost and time constraints of the inspection process. By using the right NDT technique, manufacturers can ensure that their additive manufactured parts are free from defects and meet the demanding requirements of industries such as aerospace and medicine.

Additive manufacturing technology has come a long way from being used for prototyping and concepts. Today, it is being used as part-for-part substitution in critical industries like medicine and aerospace, where the quality of the parts produced is crucial. To ensure that AM parts meet the required standards, they need to be free from discontinuities, and the manufacturing process has to be stable, robust, and repeatable. NDT technology and inspection methods are essential in detecting any defects in the parts, ensuring that they meet the required standards.

As the technology continues to evolve, the industry will continue to face new challenges. The demand for high-quality parts will only increase, and manufacturers will need to adapt to meet these demands. With continued advancements in NDT technology and inspection methods, the industry can be confident in the quality of AM parts produced, paving the way for a future where AM technology is the go-to manufacturing method for critical applications.

DT Technique	Advantages	Disadvantages	Suitable Materials	Suitable Defects
Radiographic Testing	Detects internal defects	Requires special equipment and trained personnel; harmful to health and the environment	All materials	Porosity, cracking
Ultrasonic Testing	Non-destructive; high accuracy and resolution; can detect both internal and surface defects	May not be suitable for complex geometries and rough surfaces	All materials	porosity, cracks
Magnetic Particle Testing	Detects surface and subsurface cracks in ferromagnetic materials; relatively simple and cost-effective	Only suitable for ferromagnetic materials; surface preparation is critical; requires trained personnel	Ferromagnetic materials	Surface and subsurface cracks
Liquid Penetrant Testing	Detects surface defects in non-porous materials; simple and cost-effective	Only suitable for non-porous materials; requires proper surface preparation and cleaning; may produce false indications	Non-porous materials	Surface defects such as cracks, porosity
Eddy Current Testing	Detects surface and subsurface defects in conductive materials; can detect small defects	Only suitable for conductive materials; requires trained personnel; may produce false indications	Conductive materials	Surface and subsurface defects

Note: The above table is a general comparison based on the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. The suitability of a particular technique for a specific application may depend on several factors, including the type of material, defect size and location, and the required level of accuracy and resolution.

March 27, 2023

Unlocking the Power of Additive Manufacturing: Exploring the Digital Thread
8–12 minutes

In the world of manufacturing, the digital thread is emerging as a transformative concept that promises to revolutionize the way products are designed, manufactured, and serviced. This is especially true in the realm of additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing. By providing an almost fully digital chain from part design through manufacture and service, additive manufacturing offers great potential in improving designs, processes, materials, operations, and the ability to predict failure in a way that maximizes safety and minimizes cost and downtime.

But what exactly is the digital thread, and why is it so important for additive manufacturing? To understand this, we need to first explore the concept of additive manufacturing itself.

Additive manufacturing is a process of building parts layer by layer, using a 3D computer model as a template. This is in contrast to traditional manufacturing processes, which involve subtractive methods like cutting, drilling, and shaping materials to create the desired shape. Additive manufacturing offers several advantages over traditional methods, including greater design flexibility, faster prototyping, and reduced waste.

However, additive manufacturing also introduces new challenges that must be addressed in order to fully realize its potential. One of these challenges is the need for a fully digital chain that connects the various stages of the manufacturing process, from design to production to maintenance and repair. This is where the concept of the digital thread comes in.

The digital thread refers to the virtual representation of a product that is created and maintained throughout its lifecycle, from design through manufacture and service. It encompasses all the data and information that is generated at each stage of the manufacturing process, including design files, material specifications, production logs, inspection reports, maintenance records, and more.

The digital thread provides a continuous flow of data and information that allows manufacturers to optimize their processes, improve quality, reduce costs, and enhance the overall customer experience. By creating a seamless, integrated digital thread, additive manufacturing can provide unprecedented levels of control and visibility over the entire manufacturing process.

So, what are the specific benefits of the digital thread in additive manufacturing? Let’s explore a few key areas where this technology is making a significant impact.

Improving Designs One of the primary benefits of the digital thread is its ability to improve the design process. By providing a continuous flow of data and feedback, designers can quickly identify and address issues in their designs, reducing the risk of errors and ensuring that the final product meets all requirements and specifications.

For example, let’s consider the design of a complex aerospace component. Using traditional manufacturing methods, it may take months or even years to design, build, and test a prototype of this component. With additive manufacturing and the digital thread, designers can quickly create and iterate on digital prototypes, using simulation and testing to identify potential issues and make necessary adjustments. This not only reduces the time and cost required to develop the final product, but also improves its quality and performance. Designers will be able to obtain data from manufacturing processes and use it to enhance the design at hand.

Optimizing Processes In addition to improving designs, the digital thread can also help optimize the manufacturing process itself. By collecting and analyzing data from every stage of production, manufacturers can identify areas where efficiency can be improved, waste can be reduced, and quality can be enhanced.

For example, let’s consider a manufacturer that produces metal parts using additive manufacturing. By monitoring and analyzing the data generated by each machine, the manufacturer can identify patterns and trends in production, such as which machines are most efficient, which materials produce the highest quality parts, and which stages of the process are most prone to errors or defects. Armed with this information, the manufacturer can make data-driven decisions about how to optimize their processes, reducing waste and improving overall efficiency.

“Mechanical Engineering CAD – Andrew Craig” by WorldSkills UK is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Maximizing Safety and Minimizing Cost and Downtime Perhaps the most significant benefit of the digital thread in additive manufacturing is its ability to predict failures and prevent downtime. By continuously monitoring and analyzing data from each stage of the manufacturing process, manufacturers can identify potential issues before they become serious problems, allowing them to take corrective action before a part fails or a machine breaks down.

For example, let’s consider the maintenance of a complex piece of machinery used in additive manufacturing. Using traditional methods, maintenance may be performed on a schedule, such as every six months or every year. However, this approach is often inefficient, as some machines may require more frequent maintenance while others may require less. By using the digital thread, manufacturers can monitor the performance of each machine in real-time, identifying when maintenance is needed and performing it proactively to prevent downtime and reduce costs.

Case Studies and Examples of Digital Thread in AM The benefits of the digital thread in additive manufacturing are already being realized in a number of industries, including aerospace and defense, healthcare, automotive, and consumer goods. Let’s explore a few specific examples.

Airbus is a major player in the aerospace industry, and it has been at the forefront of using additive manufacturing and digital thread technologies to improve its manufacturing processes. One example of this is Airbus’s use of additive manufacturing to produce parts for its A350 XWB aircraft. Using additive manufacturing, Airbus was able to produce complex parts with intricate designs that were previously impossible to manufacture. By optimizing the designs of these parts for additive manufacturing, Airbus was able to reduce the weight of the aircraft and improve its fuel efficiency.

Healthcare The healthcare industry has also been a strong adopter of additive manufacturing and the digital thread. One example is Oxford Performance Materials (OPM), which has used additive manufacturing to produce customized implants for patients. By using the digital thread, OPM was able to optimize the design of these implants for each individual patient, resulting in implants that were not only a perfect fit, but also optimized for the patient’s unique anatomy and medical condition.

Automotive The automotive industry has also seen significant benefits from additive manufacturing and the digital thread. One example is BMW, which has used additive manufacturing to produce customized parts for its vehicles. By using the digital thread, BMW was able to optimize the design of these parts for additive manufacturing, resulting in parts that were not only lighter and more efficient, but also customized to meet the specific needs of each vehicle.

Consumer Goods The consumer goods industry has also seen significant benefits from additive manufacturing and the digital thread. One example is Nike, which has used additive manufacturing to produce customized shoes for its customers. By using the digital thread, Nike was able to optimize the design of these shoes for each individual customer, resulting in shoes that were not only a perfect fit, but also optimized for the customer’s unique preferences and needs.

The potential of the digital thread in additive manufacturing is vast, and there are a number of emerging trends and technologies that are poised to take this technology to the next level.

Integration with AI, ML, and IoT One of the most exciting areas of development is the integration of the digital thread with other technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML),and the Internet of Things (IoT). By combining these technologies, manufacturers can create a truly smart manufacturing process that can adapt and optimize itself in real-time.

For example, imagine a manufacturing facility where every machine is connected to the internet and constantly collecting data on its performance. By using AI and ML algorithms, this data can be analyzed in real-time to identify patterns and predict when a machine is likely to fail. The system can then automatically adjust production schedules to prevent downtime and minimize costs.

In addition, AI and ML algorithms can also be used to optimize the design of parts and products, taking into account factors such as material properties, performance requirements, and manufacturing constraints. This can lead to the creation of parts and products that are not only stronger and more efficient, but also easier and cheaper to manufacture.

Digital Twins Another emerging trend in the digital thread is the use of digital twins. A digital twin is a virtual replica of a physical object, such as a machine or a part. By creating a digital twin of a machine, manufacturers can monitor its performance in real-time and predict when maintenance is needed. They can also use the digital twin to simulate different scenarios and test new designs or manufacturing processes before implementing them in the real world.

For example, imagine a manufacturer that creates a digital twin of a machine used in the production of aircraft parts. The digital twin can be used to simulate different operating conditions and test how the machine will perform under different loads and temperatures. This can help manufacturers identify potential issues before they occur and take corrective action to prevent downtime and reduce costs.

Blockchain Finally, another emerging trend in the digital thread is the use of blockchain technology. Blockchain is a secure, decentralized ledger that can be used to store and share data in a way that is transparent and tamper-proof. By using blockchain to store data related to the manufacturing process, manufacturers can create a secure and transparent supply chain that can be traced from the raw materials used to the final product.

For example, imagine a manufacturer that uses blockchain to track the materials used in the production of a complex part. The blockchain ledger can record every step of the manufacturing process, from the sourcing of raw materials to the final assembly of the part. This can help manufacturers ensure that their supply chain is ethical and sustainable, while also providing transparency to customers and regulatory bodies.

Conclusion Additive manufacturing, or 3D printing, has revolutionized the way we design and manufacture products, allowing us to create complex parts that were previously impossible to produce. However, the true potential of additive manufacturing can only be realized by using the digital thread, which provides a fully digital chain from part design through manufacture and service.

By using the digital thread, manufacturers can improve designs, processes, materials, operations, and the ability to predict failure in a way that maximizes safety and minimizes cost and downtime. The benefits of the digital thread are already being realized in industries such as aerospace and defense, healthcare, automotive, and consumer goods, and there are many emerging trends and technologies that are poised to take this technology to the next level.

As we continue to explore the potential of additive manufacturing and the digital thread, we are sure to see even more innovative solutions emerge that will transform the way we design and manufacture products. The future of manufacturing is digital, and those who embrace this technology will be well-positioned to lead the way in their respective industries.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 26, 2023
Introduction to Additive Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is a rapidly growing technology that has revolutionized the manufacturing industry. It involves building 3D objects layer by layer from digital designs, allowing for intricate and complex shapes that were once impossible to create. This article aims to provide a comprehensive beginner’s guide to additive manufacturing, including its history, types, advantages, and real-world examples.

What is Additive Manufacturing?

Additive manufacturing is a process of creating objects by adding layers of material, typically plastics or metals, on top of each other until the desired shape is achieved. This process differs from traditional manufacturing methods, such as injection molding or machining, which remove material from a block or mold until the desired shape is achieved.

How does Additive Manufacturing work?

The process of additive manufacturing typically starts with a 3D model, created using computer-aided design (CAD) software. The 3D model is then loaded into a 3D printer, which reads the model and creates the object by adding material layer by layer until the final shape is achieved. The materials used in additive manufacturing can vary widely, from plastics to metals, and even to living tissue.

History of Additive Manufacturing

The roots of additive manufacturing can be traced back to the 1980s when Chuck Hull invented stereolithography (SLA), a process that used a laser to solidify a liquid polymer. However, it wasn’t until the 2000s that additive manufacturing began to gain traction, with advancements in technology and materials leading to its widespread adoption in various industries.

Benefits of Additive Manufacturing

One of the main benefits of additive manufacturing is its ability to create complex geometries and shapes that are difficult or impossible to achieve with traditional manufacturing methods. Additive manufacturing also offers increased design flexibility, reduced lead times, and improved efficiency in manufacturing processes. With the ability to produce customized products quickly and efficiently, additive manufacturing is ideal for small-scale production runs and prototyping.

Types of Additive Manufacturing

There are several types of additive manufacturing, each with its own unique characteristics and applications. Here are some of the most commonly used types:
1. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM): FDM involves heating and extruding a thermoplastic filament through a nozzle, layer by layer, to create an object. It is one of the most widely used 3D printing technologies and is commonly used in the production of prototypes, functional parts, and even household items.
2. Stereolithography (SLA): SLA involves using a laser to cure a liquid resin into a solid object, layer by layer. It is known for its ability to produce high-resolution, intricate details, and is commonly used in the production of jewelry, dental models, and medical implants.
3. Selective Laser Sintering (SLS): SLS involves using a laser to selectively fuse powdered materials, such as metal or nylon, into a solid object, layer by layer. It is commonly used in the production of aerospace components, automotive parts, and consumer goods.
4. Binder Jetting: Binder jetting is a type of additive manufacturing that involves depositing a liquid binder onto a powdered material to create 3D objects.
Advantages of Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing offers several advantages over traditional manufacturing methods, including:
1. Design Freedom: Additive manufacturing allows for complex and intricate designs that were previously impossible to create using traditional manufacturing methods. This means that designers can create unique, customized products that meet specific needs and requirements.
2. Reduced Waste: Additive manufacturing produces less waste than traditional manufacturing methods since it only uses the exact amount of material needed to create the product. This results in reduced costs and a lower carbon footprint.
3. Faster Production: Additive manufacturing can produce parts and prototypes quickly, enabling faster product development cycles and time-to-market.
Applications of Additive Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing has a wide range of applications across various industries. Some of the most common applications include:
1. Prototyping and Product Development: Additive manufacturing is commonly used in product development and prototyping to create 3D models quickly and cost-effectively.
2. Medical and Dental Applications: Additive manufacturing has been used in medical and dental applications to create customized implants, prosthetics, and orthotics.
3. Aerospace and Automotive Industries: Additive manufacturing has been used in the aerospace and automotive industries to produce lightweight and complex components.
4. Architecture and Construction: Additive manufacturing has been used in architecture and construction to produce detailed models and prototypes of buildings and structures.
Real-World Examples of Additive Manufacturing

Many companies have successfully implemented additive manufacturing to improve their product development and manufacturing processes. Here are some real-world examples:
1. Aerospace Industry The aerospace industry has been an early adopter of additive manufacturing technology, using it to produce complex components for spacecraft and aircraft. NASA, for example, has used additive manufacturing to create rocket engine components, reducing the weight and cost of the components while increasing their performance.GE Aviation: GE Aviation uses additive manufacturing to produce complex turbine engine components, reducing the number of parts and assembly time, and improving fuel efficiency.NASA uses additive manufacturing to produce parts for its spacecraft, such as rocket engine components and satellites. Additive manufacturing allows for lightweight and strong parts that are customized to meet the specific requirements of each mission.
2. Medical Industry Additive manufacturing has been used in the medical industry to create patient-specific implants and prosthetics. Companies like Oxford Performance Materials have used the technology to create 3D-printed spinal implants that are custom-made for each patient, resulting in faster healing times and better outcomes.
3. Automotive Industry The automotive industry has also seen significant benefits from additive manufacturing. For example, Bugatti used 3D printing to create a brake caliper for their Chiron supercar, which is made from a titanium alloy and weighs 40% less than a traditional brake caliper.
4. Fashion Industry The fashion industry has also started to embrace additive manufacturing, using it to create unique and complex designs. Dutch designer Iris van Herpen has used 3D printing to create intricate and futuristic dresses, which have been worn by celebrities like Beyoncé and Lady Gaga. Adidas uses additive manufacturing to produce 3D-printed midsoles for its Futurecraft 4D shoes. This allows for customized midsoles based on an individual’s foot shape and movement.
Conclusion

Additive manufacturing has transformed the manufacturing industry, offering design freedom, reduced waste, and faster production cycles. With its ability to create intricate and complex designs, it has opened up new possibilities for customization and innovation. As the technology continues to advance and become more accessible, we can expect to see more companies adopting additive manufacturing in their production processes.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 25, 2023
Automation in Aerospace Manufacturing: Navigating the Multifaceted Challenges
As the aerospace manufacturing industry continues to soar to new heights, it is clear that the sector is one of the most advanced and sophisticated commercial manufacturing systems in existence. It’s an industry that is constantly pushing the boundaries of technology to build highly complex, safety-critical structures and parts. But, despite this, the industry is still largely reliant on human skill and dexterity during assembly.

There have been efforts to introduce automation into aerospace manufacturing, but the uptake has been relatively low. This begs the question: why? Some may point to the size of the parts or the need for extreme accuracy. However, as with any complex issue, the problems are multifaceted. There are many contradictions and unsettled aspects still to be resolved, and there are no clear-cut answers to the automation conundrum.

One of the biggest challenges facing the aerospace industry when it comes to automation is the complexity of the manufacturing process. It is not just a matter of automating one task or process; rather, it involves automating multiple tasks that require a high degree of precision and accuracy. Additionally, the parts and structures being built in aerospace manufacturing are often incredibly complex, with intricate geometries and shapes that can be difficult to manufacture using traditional techniques.

Another challenge facing the aerospace industry when it comes to automation is the need for flexibility. Aerospace manufacturing is a highly dynamic industry, with constantly changing requirements and specifications. As a result, manufacturers need to be able to quickly adapt and change their manufacturing processes to meet new demands. This can be difficult to achieve with automated systems, which are often rigid and inflexible.

Furthermore, the cost of implementing automation in aerospace manufacturing can be prohibitively high. The technology required to automate many of the manufacturing processes in aerospace is often expensive, and the initial investment can be significant. This cost can be further exacerbated by the need for specialized personnel to operate and maintain the automated systems.

Despite these challenges, there are compelling reasons for the aerospace industry to pursue automation. One of the most significant benefits of automation is the potential to increase efficiency and reduce costs. Automated systems can work faster and with greater precision than human operators, which can result in shorter production times and lower defect rates.

Another potential benefit of automation in aerospace manufacturing is improved safety. Human error is a leading cause of accidents in the aerospace industry, and automation can help to reduce the risk of accidents by eliminating the need for human operators in dangerous or hazardous situations.

Finally, automation can help to address the skills gap in the aerospace industry. The industry is facing a shortage of skilled workers, and automation can help to mitigate this issue by reducing the need for highly skilled personnel in certain areas of the manufacturing process.

So, what needs to be done to increase the uptake of automation in aerospace manufacturing? One potential solution is to focus on developing more flexible and adaptable automated systems. This would allow manufacturers to quickly adapt their manufacturing processes to meet changing requirements and specifications, without having to invest in new systems or equipment.

Another solution is to focus on reducing the cost of implementing automation in aerospace manufacturing. This could involve developing more affordable technologies or finding ways to reduce the costs associated with operating and maintaining automated systems.

Ultimately, the key to increasing the uptake of automation in aerospace manufacturing is to continue to innovate and develop new technologies that can address the unique challenges facing the industry. By working together, industry stakeholders can help to build a more efficient, safer, and sustainable aerospace manufacturing sector that can meet the demands of tomorrow.

In conclusion, while the aerospace manufacturing industry is one of the most advanced and sophisticated commercial manufacturing systems in existence, there is still much work to be done when it comes to automation. The challenges facing the industry are multifaceted, and there are no clear-cut answers to the automation conundrum. However, with a continued focus on innovation and collaboration, the aerospace industry
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 24, 2023
Additive Manufacturing: Redefining Mobility Production at Point of Use
Additive Manufacturing, or 3D-printing, technology has been a significant advancement in the manufacturing industry, with one of its most frequently mentioned benefits being the ability to produce parts at the point of use. This technology allows for the downloading of a digital file and the creation of the part on-site, which has the potential to greatly compress supply chains, lead times, inventories, and design iterations for custom parts.

The mobility industry, including automobile, aerospace, and transportation sectors, is one that demands precision, high-quality, and cost-effective solutions. Additive Manufacturing technology, with its ability to create complex geometries, lightweight designs, and rapid prototyping, is uniquely suited to meet the demands of the mobility industry. However, the viability of this technology for production at the point of use is not universal and depends on several factors, such as size, materials, build time, manufacturing complexity, cost, and competing technologies.

For the mobility industry, one of the key challenges is the size of the parts that can be produced using Additive Manufacturing technology. This is due to the limited build volume of the printer, which can increase the build time and cost for larger parts. Additionally, the quality of the part may be compromised due to the limitations of the printing process, which may not be suitable for high-stress applications, such as those found in the mobility industry.

Another challenge for the mobility industry is the limited range of materials that can be used for Additive Manufacturing. Although the range of materials that can be used has expanded with advancements in materials science, the majority of Additive Manufacturing materials are limited to plastics and some metals. This may not be suitable for applications that require high-strength materials, such as those found in the aerospace or automotive industries.

Despite these challenges, the mobility industry is investing in Additive Manufacturing capacity for production at the point of use. One of the key benefits of this technology is the ability to reduce supply chain and inventory costs by producing parts on-site. Additionally, the ability to create complex geometries and lightweight designs can lead to a reduction in fuel consumption and emissions, which is crucial in the transportation industry.

Moreover, Additive Manufacturing technology can significantly reduce the design iterations required for custom parts, leading to a faster time-to-market for new products and an increase in the speed of innovation. For instance, automotive companies can use Additive Manufacturing technology to rapidly prototype and test new designs, which can reduce the time and cost associated with traditional manufacturing methods.

However, it is essential for companies in the mobility industry to evaluate the feasibility and benefits of Additive Manufacturing technology on a case-by-case basis. This requires a deep understanding of the technology and its capabilities, as well as an evaluation of the costs and benefits associated with using Additive Manufacturing technology for production at the point of use.

In conclusion, Additive Manufacturing technology is a significant advancement for the mobility industry, providing unique advantages such as the ability to produce parts at the point of use and reduce supply chain and inventory costs. However, the viability of this technology for production at the point of use is dependent on several factors, including the size and complexity of the part, the materials used, and the cost of the technology. Therefore, it is important for the mobility industry to carefully evaluate the feasibility and benefits of Additive Manufacturing technology for their specific needs.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 23, 2023
Advancing Surface Finishing in Additive Manufacturing: Challenges and Innovations
As I sit here contemplating the advancements in additive manufacturing technology, my mind wanders to the marvels that laser and electron-beam powder bed fusion (PBF) have brought to the world of production components. The once prototyping and tooling technology has now found its way into the demanding fields of medicine and aerospace, bringing with it a host of advantages that traditional manufacturing techniques could never hope to match.

With the advent of PBF, components with complex geometries that were once impossible to create are now a reality. The ability to manufacture parts layer-by-layer using a laser or electron-beam has revolutionized the way we think about production. But like all great advancements, there is still room for improvement.

Initial applications of PBF took advantage of the relatively high surface roughness of metal parts, or they were used in environments where surface roughness did not impose performance penalties. However, to truly move to the next level of performance, the surfaces of PBF components will need to be smoother than the current as-printed surfaces. Achieving this on increasingly complex geometries without significantly increasing the cost of the final component will be the next challenge.

But fear not, dear reader, for there are those who are hard at work on this very challenge. Researchers and engineers alike are exploring new techniques and methods to create smoother surfaces on PBF components. One such method is to use a post-processing technique known as chemical polishing.

Chemical polishing involves immersing the PBF component in a chemical bath that selectively removes material from the surface, leaving a smooth and shiny finish. This technique has been used successfully on simple geometries, but its use on more complex parts has been limited due to the difficulty in controlling the chemical reaction across the entire surface of the part.

Another method being explored is the use of lasers to selectively melt and smooth the surface of the part. This technique, known as laser polishing, involves using a laser to melt the surface of the part, causing it to flow and smooth out. While this technique has shown promise, it is still in the early stages of development and has yet to be proven on more complex geometries.

Despite the challenges, the need for smoother surfaces on PBF components is clear. In demanding fields such as aerospace and medicine, even the slightest imperfection can have catastrophic consequences. As PBF continues to push the boundaries of what is possible in production, the need for smoother surfaces will only become more pressing.

So, what does the future hold for PBF and its quest for smoother surfaces? The answer is not yet clear, but one thing is certain: the brilliant minds working on this challenge will continue to push the limits of what is possible. Whether it be through chemical polishing, laser polishing, or some other method yet to be discovered, the day will come when complex geometries can be produced with the smoothest of surfaces, without significantly increasing the cost of the final component.

As I conclude this contemplation, I am left with a sense of awe at the possibilities that lie ahead. The world of additive manufacturing is constantly evolving and advancing, and I, for one, cannot wait to see what the future holds.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 22, 2023
Desktop Metal and TriTech Titanium Parts Bring Titanium Alloy Ti64 to Binder Jet 3D Printing on the Production System™
TriTech Titanium Parts LLC, a Detroit-based manufacturer of titanium parts for aerospace, marine, and automotive industries, and Desktop Metal, Inc., a global leader in additive manufacturing technologies for mass production, have announced the customer-qualification of Ti64 for binder jet 3D printing on the Production System™. The high-speed Single Pass Jetting (SPJ) technology platform features two models: the P-1, for research and development of binder jetting projects for serial production, and the P-50, the world’s fastest metal binder jet system, offering the lowest cost per part with SPJ technology. Ti64 is a popular material, known for its excellent strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. Binder jetting of Ti64 simplifies the production of complex titanium parts, which can be challenging and expensive to fabricate using traditional manufacturing methods.

Desktop Metal Production System via Desktop Metal

TriTech Titanium Parts LLC, which is ISO 9001:2015 certified, uses metal injection molding (MIM), investment casting, and now binder jet 3D printing on the Desktop Metal Production System P-1 to produce titanium parts. The company is a spin-off of AmeriTi Manufacturing Co., which was founded in 1984 and sold last year to Kymera International.

TriTech’s owner, Robert Swenson, who is also the former owner of AmeriTi, stated that with binder jet 3D printing, titanium production of even the most complex geometries can be greatly simplified and achieved at a lower cost. Swenson, a graduate of Purdue University with a degree in Metallurgical Engineering and an MBA from Harvard Business School, is incredibly proud to be the first Desktop Metal Production System P-1 customer worldwide to binder jet 3D print titanium, and the company is excited to offer this new manufacturing technology to its customers.

With the latest addition to the material portfolio, Desktop Metal offers the ability to binder jet 23 metals, including copper, aluminum, and now, titanium. Ric Fulop, Founder and CEO of Desktop Metal, stated that they are excited to help engineers and manufacturers produce complex, once-impossible designs in a wide range of metals, including challenging materials such as titanium.

While Ti64 is a popular material, it’s also known for being expensive to manufacture. The material’s strength, as well as its low thermal conductivity and ductility, make it challenging to machine or produce with traditional manufacturing methods. Shaping the material with MIM requires special knowledge and processes. TriTech is among a very small percentage of companies that produce titanium parts with MIM, and the company has developed its own MIM processes after years of R&D. However, with binder jetting, the process can be simplified and made more economical.

Binder jetting is a process where an industrial printhead selectively deposits a binder into a bed of Ti64 powder particles, creating a solid part one thin layer at a time, just like printing on sheets of paper. The form or shape produced by the printer is then sintered to high density and accuracy in a furnace, similar to the MIM process. Additionally, binder jetting allows unbound material to be reused in the process, adding to its cost efficiency.

Desktop Metal’s binder jet technology can 3D print almost any powder, which is why the company has a tiered material qualification system for metals to signify the varying levels of material property results produced by. Production System users interested in working with titanium should consult their Desktop Metal sales representative on hardware and binder requirements.

TriTech will discuss its experience binder jetting Ti64 at AMUG 2023, held March 19-23 in Chicago. The topic will be part of a Desktop Metal panel discussion from 1:30-2:30 p.m. Thursday, March 23,
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 21, 2023
Generating GCODE for 3D Printing with Chat GPT-4:
The world of 3D printing is ever-changing, and it’s no secret that AI technologies are playing an increasingly significant role in this field. From 3D model creation to the slicing and printing process, artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach 3D printing. In this blog post, we explore the potential of ChatGPT 4, an advanced language model, to generate GCODE for 3D printing, and how it can eliminate the need for traditional slicing software.

If you’re a 3D printing expert, you’re likely familiar with GCODE, the machine-readable code that tells your 3D printer how to move and extrude the filament to create your desired object. However, generating GCODE is not as straightforward as it may seem. It involves several steps, including slicing, optimizing printing parameters, and ensuring printability. Slicing software like Cura or Simplify3D is typically used to slice a 3D model into layers, generate GCODE, and optimize print settings. However, this process can be time-consuming and requires expertise to achieve optimal results.

ChatGPT 4 is an advanced language model that can generate human-like text. It’s trained on a massive corpus of text and can understand and respond to text-based inputs. While it’s not specifically designed for 3D printing, its capabilities have the potential to simplify the GCODE generation process. By integrating ChatGPT 4 with 3D model repositories, it could eliminate the need for traditional slicing software.

Here is an example :

Prompt : write the gcode of 10cm * 10cm * 10cm cube with 50% infill for an open source reprap design 3d printer

ChatGPT: Sure! Here is the GCODE for a 10cm x 10cm x 10cm cube with 50% infill for an open source RepRap design 3D printer:
```
; start GCODE
M140 S60      ; set bed temperature to 60°C
M190 S60      ; wait for bed to reach temperature
M104 S210     ; set extruder temperature to 210°C
M109 S210     ; wait for extruder to reach temperature

G21           ; set units to millimeters
G90           ; use absolute coordinates
M83           ; use relative extrusion distance

G28           ; home all axes
G1 Z15.0 F9000 ; move up 15mm from the bed
G92 E0        ; reset extruder position

; layer 1
G1 X10 Y10 Z0.3 F9000   ; move to the starting point
G1 Z0.2 F9000          ; lower the nozzle to the bed
G1 E10 F900            ; extrude 10mm of filament
G1 X90 E15 F1200       ; move to the next point while extruding
G1 Y90 E25            ; move to the next point while extruding
G1 X10 E35             ; move to the next point while extruding
G1 Y10 E45             ; move back to the starting point while extruding
G1 E0 F900             ; retract the filament

; layer 2-49
; repeat the layer 1 code for the remaining layers, increasing the Z height by 0.2mm each time

; layer 50
G1 X10 Y10 Z9.8 F9000   ; move to the starting point
G1 Z9.7 F9000           ; lower the nozzle to the bed
G1 E10 F900             ; extrude 10mm of filament
G1 X90 E15 F1200        ; move to the next point while extruding
G1 Y90 E25              ; move to the next point while extruding
G1 X10 E35              ; move to the next point while extruding
G1 Y10 E45              ; move back to the starting point while extruding
G1 E0 F900              ; retract the filament

; end GCODE
G28 X Y         ; home the X and Y axes
M84             ; disable motors
```
For example, imagine that you want to print a complex 3D model that requires significant optimization and tweaking of print settings. Instead of manually adjusting these settings in a slicer, you could simply input your desired parameters into ChatGPT 4, and it would generate the GCODE for you. This could save time and streamline the printing process, particularly for more complex models.

Moreover, ChatGPT 4 can also be used to modify existing models for 3D printing. For instance, if you have a model that needs to be resized or modified in some way, you could input your desired changes into ChatGPT 4, and it would generate the modified model for you. This could be particularly useful for customizing 3D prints or creating unique objects.

While ChatGPT 4 shows promise in generating GCODE for 3D printing, it’s important to note that it has its limitations. One of the primary challenges is that ChatGPT 4 lacks an understanding of physical constraints, material properties, and printer capabilities. This means that the GCODE it generates may not be optimized for your specific printer, and it may not take into account the properties of the filament you’re using.

Another limitation of ChatGPT 4 is that it may not be able to optimize the print settings as effectively as traditional slicing software. Slicers like Cura and Simplify3D are designed to provide a high degree of control over the printing process, allowing users to fine-tune the settings for optimal results. ChatGPT 4, on the other hand, may not be able to provide the same level of precision.

Despite its limitations, the potential applications of ChatGPT 4 in 3D printing are exciting. One of the most promising applications is the ability to create 3D physical objects, similar to how DALL-E creates images. By inputting a description of the object you want to create, ChatGPT 4 could generate a 3D model and GCODE for 3D printing, effectively turning it into a sculptor version of DALL-E. This could have far-reaching implications for the world of 3D printing, as it could simplify the process of creating custom objects, prototypes, and replacement parts.

Another potential application of ChatGPT 4 in 3D printing is its ability to learn from user feedback. As users provide feedback on the GCODE it generates, ChatGPT 4 could learn from this feedback and improve its GCODE generation capabilities. This could lead to more accurate and optimized GCODE generation, as well as a more personalized printing experience.

Furthermore, integrating ChatGPT 4 with 3D model repositories could open up new possibilities for 3D printing. For example, users could search for models based on descriptions, keywords, or even images, and ChatGPT 4 could generate the GCODE for printing. This could make 3D printing more accessible to a wider audience, as it would eliminate the need for expertise in 3D modeling and slicing.

In conclusion, ChatGPT 4 has the potential to revolutionize the way we approach GCODE generation in 3D printing. While its limitations must be considered, its ability to simplify the printing process and generate customized GCODE is promising. Moreover, its potential applications in creating 3D physical objects and learning from user feedback could lead to further advancements in the field of 3D printing. As AI technologies continue to evolve, we can expect to see further innovations in the world of 3D printing and beyond.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 20, 2023
Desktop Metal and CETIM Qualify 304L Stainless Steel for 3D Printing on Shop System™: A Step Forward in Additive Manufacturing
Desktop Metal and CETIM have announced the successful qualification of 304L stainless steel for use on the Shop System™. This new development complements the suite of stainless steel materials already qualified on the mid-sized binder jet printer, including 17-4PH and 316L.

304L stainless steel is noteworthy for its high tensile strength, corrosion resistance, and durability, making it ideal for a wide range of applications, such as structural components, food processing equipment, fluid transfer components, and welded components. This new qualification means that it is now possible to produce complex geometries of 304L parts on demand with little to no waste, whether in low or high volumes.

Desktop Metal Shop System via Desktop Metal

CETIM, in collaboration with Desktop Metal, worked on the parameter development for 304L, enabling the material to be offered on the Shop System binder jet 3D printing system. The aim of this collaboration is to support quick production of critical replacement parts in the French energy sector, such as those used in fuel processing and nuclear components. This will help to reduce lead times for critical 304L maintenance parts, avoiding long and expensive downtimes in the factory.

Christophe Reynaud, Ph.D., Additive Manufacturing Material Engineer at CETIM, stated that “304L is a key material in the energy sector due to its corrosion resistance, suited for highly demanding environments such as civil nuclear applications. Coupled with the high versatility and responsiveness of the Shop System, it is now possible to considerably reduce the lead-time for critical 304L maintenance parts.”

This qualification of 304L stainless steel adds to the Shop System material portfolio, which now includes 17-4PH and 316L, IN625, and Cobalt-Chrome. IN718 is now fast-tracked for final development on Shop.

Ric Fulop, Founder and CEO of Desktop Metal, said, “This new material offering will allow manufacturers to produce complex geometries of 304L parts on demand with little to no waste, whether they are interested in low or high volumes. 304L is a flexible, widely used stainless steel across many industries, and we’re delighted to offer it in our affordable, popular Shop System model.”

The 304L stainless steel printed with the Shop System and sintered in an Ipsen graphite furnace meets or exceeds the minimum tensile properties and the chemical composition outlined in the ASTM A240 standard. Further development is underway to further qualify binder jet 3D printed 304L for use in food-processing equipment applications and for applications involving welding.

Desktop Metal Shop System Part via Desktop Metal

CETIM works closely with industrial companies to help identify market opportunities and facilitate innovation and technical progress. They were one of the first adopters of the Shop System, the Production System™ P-1, and also own a Desktop Metal Studio System™, a Bound Metal Deposition (BMD) metal printing system.

In conclusion, the qualification of 304L stainless steel for use on the Shop System™ is a significant development for the additive manufacturing industry. This new material offering will enable manufacturers to produce complex geometries of 304L parts on demand, with little to no waste, whether in low or high volumes. The collaboration between Desktop Metal and CETIM has made it possible to reduce lead times for critical 304L maintenance parts, avoiding long and expensive downtimes in the factory. The addition of 304L to the Shop System material portfolio complements the suite of stainless steel materials already qualified, including 17-4PH and 316L, IN625, and Cobalt-Chrome, making the Shop System an affordable, popular option for manufacturers across many industries.
Share this:
LinkedIn
X
Facebook
Reddit
Like this:
Like Loading…
March 19, 2023